Should Christians Celebrate Lent What is Lent? Is Lent Biblical?

History of Lent:
This will be more of a pop-history overview, and not a deep dive, but that should be sufficient for most who are curious about the origins of Lent, or are unfamiliar with its practice.
First, and this is pretty important, Lent is NOT a mandated biblical practice, BUT in many ways it has roots in biblical practices, and many wings of the Christian church have been practicing Lent, or Lent-like observances since at least the second or third century, possibly earlier, but the word Lent itself is first mentioned by the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, though the way they mention it, it is clear that this is an accepted practice of the church at the time. In other words, the first extant mention of Lent is 325 AD, but the church had been observing Lent for quite some time before that.
Second, what does the word even mean? Has somebody borrowed something? Not at all. Lent comes from an old English word, lencten, which stood for the spring season…that word seems to come from a word that could potentially mean long, as in longer days, which begins to happen in the Spring season. In other languages, like Greek and Latin, the word for Lent Tessarakostí and quadragesima, indicates 40 - as in the 40 days before Easter.
Also, why does Lent start today when today, Ash Wednesday is not 40 days before Easter, but FORTY-SIX? Well the answer lies in church history, and the practice of the early church to FEAST on Sundays. In 601, Pope Gregory I moved the beginning of Lent to 46 days before Easter, allowing for the usual 40 days of fasting plus six Sundays of feasting when the rules of fasting did not apply. Into modernity, the Lenten season is 46, rather than 40 days, and most suspend fasting on Sundays. Further, most Christians who observe Lent do not do a complete fast. In the early church, Christians might have fasted from meat, or rich foods, or richly seasoned foods. Many today fast until sundown.
History of Lent:
This will be more of a pop-history overview, and not a deep dive, but that should be sufficient for most who are curious about the origins of Lent, or are unfamiliar with its practice.
First, and this is pretty important, Lent is NOT a mandated biblical practice, BUT in many ways it has roots in biblical practices, and many wings of the Christian church have been practicing Lent, or Lent-like observances since at least the second or third century, possibly earlier, but the word Lent itself is first mentioned by the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, though the way they mention it, it is clear that this is an accepted practice of the church at the time. In other words, the first extant mention of Lent is 325 AD, but the church had been observing Lent for quite some time before that.
Second, what does the word even mean? Has somebody borrowed something? Not at all. Lent comes from an old English word, lencten, which stood for the spring season…that word seems to come from a word that could potentially mean long, as in longer days, which begins to happen in the Spring season. In other languages, like Greek and Latin, the word for Lent Tessarakostí and quadragesima, indicates 40 - as in the 40 days before Easter.
Also, why does Lent start today when today, Ash Wednesday is not 40 days before Easter, but FORTY-SIX? Well the answer lies in church history, and the practice of the early church to FEAST on Sundays. In 601, Pope Gregory I moved the beginning of Lent to 46 days before Easter, allowing for the usual 40 days of fasting plus six Sundays of feasting when the rules of fasting did not apply. Into modernity, the Lenten season is 46, rather than 40 days, and most suspend fasting on Sundays. Further, most Christians who observe Lent do not do a complete fast. In the early church, Christians might have fasted from meat, or rich foods, or richly seasoned foods. Many today fast until sundown. Almost nobody does a complete food fast, as the one that Jesus did in the wilderness.
So let’s look at the biblical roots of Lent, and then look at the historical roots, and then a word or two on whether Christians should celebrate Lent, and why they do. As mentioned earlier, there is no indication that the early church, as recorded in the Book of Acts and the Epistles/letters to the church, practiced Lent. They did fast, as Jesus predicted they would in Luke 5:35, “But the time will come when the groom will be taken away from them—then they will fast in those days.” We see the early church fasting in Acts 13:2, right before Paul and Barnabas were commissioned as missionaries, “As they were ministering to the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, “Set apart for Me Barnabas and Saul for the work I have called them to.” Fasting was a practice the Jews were very used to, as they fasted on the Day of Atonement, and many other times, and it was still a prominent practice in the early church as we see from Acts 27:9, which says, “By now much time had passed, and the voyage was already dangerous. Since the Fast was already over, Paul gave his advice.” As Acts 9:9 says, Paul fasted three days after he was saved by Jesus, so fasting was common in the biblical church, and the early church, and the modern church. Interestingly, fasting is NOT commanded in any of the New Testament letters nor any other place in the NT. So why Fast? Well, because fasting is modeled in the OId Testament (mentioned at least 25 times), and - much more significantly - because JESUS fasted. As David Mathis from Desiring God notes:
Faithful fasting, whatever the conditions of its origin, is rooted in human lack and need — for God. We need his help, his favor, his guidance. We need his rescue and comfort in trouble. We need his forgiveness and grace because we have sinned. We need God. He, not human circumstances or activity, is the common denominator of fasting. Fasting expresses to God our pointedly felt need for God. We have daily needs, and unusual ones. We pray for daily bread, and in times of special need, we reach for the prayer-amplifier called fasting…In fasting, we confess we are not home yet, and remember that we are not homeless. In fasting, we cry out to our Groom [Jesus], and remember that we have his covenant promises. In fasting, we confess our lack, and remember that the one with every resource has pledged his help in his perfect timing.
Source: https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/why-do-christians-fast
So Lent grew in the early church because the Old Testament saints fasted, and because fasting happened in the New Testament - and most especially, because Jesus fasted. And, of course, Jesus fasted FORTY DAYS, and Lent lasts forty days. So how did we get from those facts - the OT saints fasted, the early biblical followers of Jesus fasted, and Jesus Himself fasted 40 days in the wilderness to where we are now - the observation of Lent, Ash Wednesday, etc. And the answer is church history and church tradition, and very early church history. As noted the first time that Lent has been mentioned that has survived is in Canon 5 of the Council of Nicaea, which is NOT at all about fasting or Lent or church feasts and festivals, but is rather about excommunication. The pertinent part says, “...it is decreed that in every province synods shall be held twice a year, in order that when all the bishops of the province are assembled together, such questions may by them be thoroughly examined, that so those who have confessedly offended against their bishop, may be seen by all to be for just cause excommunicated, until it shall seem fit to a general meeting of the bishops to pronounce a milder sentence upon them. And let these synods be held, the one before Lent, (that the pure Gift may be offered to God after all bitterness has been put away), and let the second be held about autumn.” So the point of this mention was that those who have been excommunicated, or expelled from the communion of the church, might have the possibility of being restored before Lent and Easter/the resurrection of Jesus is celebrated. The way that canon refers to Lent, however, is very clear that this is not the first that those people have heard of Lent, and it indicates that by 325AD, early in the 4th century, the church generally observed Lent prior to Easter.
How long it had been going on prior to that, we have no idea, but we do know that the Didache, a compilation of early church teachings that dates to the second, or first century, did prescribe fasting before baptism, saying: “And concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, Matthew 28:19 in living water. But if you have not living water, baptize into other water; and if you can not in cold, in warm. But if you have not either, pour out water thrice upon the head into the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit. But before the baptism let the baptizer fast, and the baptized, and whatever others can; but you shall order the baptized to fast one or two days before.” And we also know that Tertullian, who wrote in the second and early 3rd centuries, said that Easter/resurrectiond day was a "most solemn day for baptism."
So, putting all of that together, I think we can clearly see the origin for Lent, with roots in the OT, roots in the NT, roots in the practice of Jesus, and roots in the practice of the earliest apostolic churches. Many, if not most, traditions of Lent developed well after the New Testament and even after the time of the early church of the first centuries. That doesn’t make the practices invalid, but for many Christians, the teachings of Jesus and the apostles contained in the New Testament are the ultimate authorities for our practices, and not church tradition. That said, while the practice of Lent is not commanded by the Word of God, it certainly has its roots in the Word of God, and it is not prohibited. In that spirit, I’d like to offer some cautions and encouragements:
3 Reasons to Practice Lent and Three Reasons NOT to Practice Lent.
1. The practice of Lent - fasting before the celebration of Easter - is, as noted, rooted in Scripture. Fasting is a good thing, a long-noted Christian spiritual discipline that has been practiced fruitfully for nearly two thousand years by the Christian church.
“Christian fasting is unique among all the fasting in the world,” says John Piper. “It is unique in that it expresses more than longing for Christ or hunger for Christ’s presence. It is a hunger that is rooted in, based on, an already present, experienced reality of Christ in history and in our hearts.”
In Christ, fasting is not just a Godward expression of our need. It is not just an admission that we are not full. Fasting is a statement — in the very midst of our need — that we are not empty.”
2. In Fasting and Ash Wednesday, when Christians put ashes on their foreheads, they do so for in solidarity with great Saints of the past. Esther 4:1 notes that “When Mordecai learned all that had been done, Mordecai tore his clothes and put on sackcloth and ashes and went through the city, wailing with a loud and bitter cry” . In Job 42:6, as he repented before God, Job says, “Therefore, I disown what I have said, and repent in dust and ashes.” In Daniel 9:3, Daniel describes his approach to God, saying, “I turned to the Lord God, to seek help, in prayer and petition, with fasting, sackcloth, and ashes.” So the ashes symbolize repentance and an intentional focus on pursuing the Lord, an ideal practice during the weeks leading up to Easter, and any other time too. With ashes in the shape of a cross, we remember that we are not Old Testament saints laboring under a sacrificial atonement system based on the slaughter of animals, but rather a New Covenant founded on the slaughter and resurrection of Christ the King.
3. In fasting, we imitate Jesus, who also fasted, which is a wonderful thing. In the same way that some have their quiet times of prayer and Bible reading at the precise same times each day, and others don’t…some Christians fast at certain times during the year, following the ancient church calendar, and some Christians fast based on need and situation. As Charles Spurgeon will tell us in a moment, both approaches are okay according to the Bible, and neither should be judged or treated as better than the other.
Lent - IF it focuses us on Christ and prepares us to appreciate and celebrate the resurrection of Jesus in a more intentional and deeper-reaching way, can be a wonderful thing. However, Lent, IF it becomes ritualized without meaning, can become a vain and empty practice that has no spiritual value. Or, perhaps even worse, if Lent is viewed as a way to receive salvific grace from God by the works of fasting and self-denial, then Lent can become almost idolotrous in that our own practice has the potential to replace the finished work of Christ on the Cross. And, along those lines, here are three cautions about Lent:
1. Lent should not provide us an opportunity to judge other Christians in their pursuit of God. Paul writes in Colossians 2:16, “16 Therefore, don’t let anyone judge you in regard to food and drink or in the matter of a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day. 17 These are a shadow of what was to come; the substance is the Messiah.” Because Lent isn’t commanded in Scripture, it is wrong and unwise to judge the behavior of Christians based on whether or not they observe this season of fasting. Similarly, “One person esteems one day as better than another, while another esteems all days alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind,” says Paul (Romans 14:5) This is certainly not an area to judge - to his own master, he stands or falls. (Romans 14:4)
2. Lent should not become for us an avenue of receiving salvific grace from God through works. I know this is a point of contention between Protestants and others, but fasting can be a good thing, and certainly a way to mortify human/fleshly desires that are sinful, and provide a way to grow closer to God, and that is good. But when Lent is looked on as a means of saving grace…a means of earning merit to be saved, then it becomes dangerous. As Charles Spurgeon said, in commenting on Colossians 2:16, “Do not let anybody come in, and tell you that it is necessary for your salvation that you should abstain from this meat or that drink, that there is a merit in fasting for forty days in Lent, or that you cannot be saved without observing such and such a holy day. Your salvation is in Christ. Keep you to that, and add nothing to this one foundation which is once for all laid in him.”
3. Finally, I think it is dangerous to MANDATE a practice that is not mandated by Scripture. Saint Augustine of Hippo wrote that: "Our fast at any other time is voluntary; but during Lent, we sin if we do not fast." I like Saint Augustine, and I am grateful for him, but I disagree with our guy here…we should not declare something a sin that Scripture does not declare is sinful. That’s a dangerous practice.
Reformation 21 writer Carl Trueman concurs, saying, “My commitment to Christian liberty means that I certainly would not regard it as sinful in itself for [Christians to observe Lent]; but that same commitment also means that I object most strongly to anybody trying to argue that it should be a normative practice for Christians, to impose it on their congregations, or to claim that it confers benefits unavailable elsewhere.”
Tim Challies, an excellent Reformed writer, issues a caution about the observance of Lent, writing, “I do not observe Lent. I never have and don’t ever expect to. My reasoning is first biblical: I’m hesitant to add practices the Bible does not command, especially when it seems tepid, at best, about similar practices. Then there’s the practical: my church covers this ground every week as we corporately remember Christ’s sacrifice and confess our sins and receive assurance of God’s forgiveness. And then there’s the historical angle: I want to be historic, not innovative, in my faith, and I find eschewing Lent to be most consistent with the Reformed tradition.”
I don’t know that I would be that cautious, but I do think that Baptists like myself would often benefit from more intentionality and mooring to the more biblical aspects of church history and practice. At the same time, Lent, nor any other unmandated Christian tradition observance, must never replace the intimacy and vibrancy of knowing Christ, reading His Word, turning from sins, and remembering daily His sacrifice, crucifixion, and resurrection. If Lent helps you do that, then it might be a good thing, but never let any ritual supplant Christ and His Word in you, the hope of glory.
WEBVTT
00:00:00.017 --> 00:00:04.077
So today's Lent. Let's talk about the history of Lent.
00:00:04.337 --> 00:00:10.037
Why do Christians do Lent? So this is going to be more of a pop history overview
00:00:10.037 --> 00:00:12.397
and not really a deep academic dive,
00:00:12.397 --> 00:00:17.217
but that should be sufficient for most people who are curious about the origins
00:00:17.217 --> 00:00:22.657
of Lent or are unfamiliar with its practice. And first, this is pretty important.
00:00:23.057 --> 00:00:29.337
Lent, L-E-N-T, is not a mandated biblical practice, but in many ways,
00:00:29.537 --> 00:00:32.477
it has its roots in biblical practices.
00:00:33.217 --> 00:00:37.997
Many wings of the Christian church have been practicing Lent for centuries,
00:00:38.497 --> 00:00:44.217
maybe even since the second century or the third century, maybe even earlier than that.
00:00:44.357 --> 00:00:50.097
But the word Lent itself is really first mentioned in the Council of Nicaea,
00:00:50.277 --> 00:00:52.417
which happened in 325 AD.
00:00:52.777 --> 00:00:56.877
And the way they mention it in one of the canons of the Council of Nicaea,
00:00:56.877 --> 00:01:02.677
It's pretty clear that the church had been practicing it for quite some time at that point.
00:01:02.937 --> 00:01:07.997
So what does the word even mean? L-E-N-T. Is somebody borrowed something?
00:01:08.699 --> 00:01:12.959
It really has nothing to do with that at all. It comes from an old English word,
00:01:13.279 --> 00:01:18.539
L-E-N-C-T-E-N, which stood for the spring season.
00:01:18.739 --> 00:01:23.699
And that word seems to come from a different word or a related word that could
00:01:23.699 --> 00:01:29.019
mean long as in longer days, which, you know, kind of begins to happen in the
00:01:29.019 --> 00:01:32.179
spring season. You get to have more and more light.
00:01:32.339 --> 00:01:38.159
In other languages like Greek and Latin, the word for Lent actually refers more
00:01:38.159 --> 00:01:42.519
to 40 days, as in the 40 days before Easter.
00:01:42.819 --> 00:01:48.359
So, Lent in the Greek is Tessaracosti, and in Latin, it's Quadragosima.
00:01:48.779 --> 00:01:54.419
And I don't speak Greek or Latin very well there. So, why does Lent start today
00:01:54.419 --> 00:02:01.699
on February 18th, when today is actually 46 days, not 40 days before Easter?
00:02:01.859 --> 00:02:06.239
Well, The thing is, the answer to that question lies in church history.
00:02:06.479 --> 00:02:10.479
Pope Gregory I, in 601 AD,
00:02:10.779 --> 00:02:15.659
so a long time ago, moved the beginning of Lent from where it was at the time,
00:02:15.819 --> 00:02:18.199
which is 40 days before Easter,
00:02:18.379 --> 00:02:26.779
to 46 days because in that day, most Christians suspended fasting on Sundays,
00:02:26.779 --> 00:02:29.559
which were considered feasting days.
00:02:29.559 --> 00:02:33.559
And beyond that, most Christians who observe Lent, even today,
00:02:33.759 --> 00:02:35.659
don't do a complete fast.
00:02:35.679 --> 00:02:41.379
In the early church, Christians might have fasted meat or rich foods or foods
00:02:41.379 --> 00:02:43.579
with a lot of spices, that kind of thing.
00:02:44.339 --> 00:02:50.639
Many today pick one thing to fast, like sugar or meat or treats or whatever,
00:02:50.879 --> 00:02:54.379
and some others only fast until sundown.
00:02:54.599 --> 00:03:02.499
Almost nobody that observes Lent does a complete fast like the one that Jesus did in the wilderness.
00:03:02.799 --> 00:03:06.079
Let's look at the biblical roots of Lent, and then we're going to look at the
00:03:06.079 --> 00:03:10.979
historical roots of Lent, and maybe then a word or two on whether or not Christians
00:03:10.979 --> 00:03:14.999
today should celebrate Lent and why they celebrate Lent.
00:03:15.139 --> 00:03:19.399
And as mentioned earlier, there's no indication that the early church,
00:03:19.399 --> 00:03:22.619
as recorded in the book of Acts and the letters of apostles,
00:03:23.119 --> 00:03:27.779
there's no indication the early church practiced Lent, but they did fast.
00:03:28.019 --> 00:03:31.919
Jesus predicted that would happen. In Luke chapter 5, verse 35,
00:03:32.139 --> 00:03:35.779
he says, the time will come when the groom, referring to himself,
00:03:35.779 --> 00:03:40.479
will be taken away from them, then they will fast on those days.
00:03:40.539 --> 00:03:45.939
And we do see the early church fasting in passages like Acts chapter 13,
00:03:46.219 --> 00:03:51.859
verse 2, where it says, it's talked about when Paul and Barnabas were commissioned
00:03:51.859 --> 00:03:56.619
as missionaries, and the word says, they were ministering to the Lord and fasting,
00:03:56.859 --> 00:04:02.339
and the Holy Spirit said, set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work I have called them to.
00:04:02.911 --> 00:04:07.411
Fasting was a practice the Jews were very used to, and they fasted on the Day
00:04:07.411 --> 00:04:13.411
of Atonement many other times, and that fasting among the Jews was still very
00:04:13.411 --> 00:04:15.491
prominent in the early church,
00:04:15.691 --> 00:04:20.231
even among the Christians, as we see in Acts 27.9, which says,
00:04:20.411 --> 00:04:24.911
By now much time had passed, and the voyage was already dangerous.
00:04:24.911 --> 00:04:29.491
Since the fast was already over, Paul gave his advice.
00:04:29.491 --> 00:04:36.031
And Acts 9.9 says that Paul himself fasted three days and three nights after
00:04:36.031 --> 00:04:40.551
he was saved by Jesus encountering him on the road to Damascus.
00:04:40.751 --> 00:04:45.471
And fasting was just common in the biblical church and the early church and
00:04:45.471 --> 00:04:47.991
is still common today in the modern church.
00:04:48.351 --> 00:04:54.331
Interestingly, even though it has been common over the entire history of the
00:04:54.331 --> 00:05:00.231
church, fasting is not commanded in any of the New Testament letters or any
00:05:00.231 --> 00:05:02.031
other place in the New Testament.
00:05:02.031 --> 00:05:04.111
It wasn't commanded by Jesus.
00:05:04.391 --> 00:05:07.591
So why should Christians fast? Well.
00:05:08.276 --> 00:05:13.016
The answer to that question is really because fasting is modeled in the Old Testament,
00:05:13.616 --> 00:05:17.856
mentioned well over two dozen times, and much more significantly,
00:05:18.356 --> 00:05:24.256
Jesus himself lived a life of fasting, and he modeled it for us.
00:05:24.376 --> 00:05:29.136
David Mathis from Desiring God says, Faithful fasting, whatever the conditions
00:05:29.136 --> 00:05:35.796
of its origin, is rooted in human lack and need for God. We need his help,
00:05:35.936 --> 00:05:37.236
his favor, his guidance.
00:05:37.256 --> 00:05:40.536
We need his rescue and comfort in trouble.
00:05:40.756 --> 00:05:45.296
We need his forgiveness and grace because we've all sinned. We need God.
00:05:45.816 --> 00:05:53.356
He, not human circumstances or activity or materials, is the common denominator of fasting.
00:05:53.656 --> 00:05:58.616
Fasting expresses to God our pointedly felt need for God.
00:05:58.816 --> 00:06:03.396
We have daily needs and some unusual ones. We pray for daily bread,
00:06:03.396 --> 00:06:09.536
and in times of special need, we reach for the prayer amplifier called fasting.
00:06:09.796 --> 00:06:17.556
In fasting, we confess we are not home yet and remember at the same time that we are not homeless.
00:06:17.856 --> 00:06:24.556
In fasting, we cry out to our groom, Jesus, and remember that we have his covenant promises.
00:06:24.876 --> 00:06:31.636
In fasting, we confess our lack, and we remember that the one with every resource
00:06:31.636 --> 00:06:36.756
available has pledged his help in his perfect timing.
00:06:37.116 --> 00:06:41.976
So Lent grew in the early church because the Old Testament saints fasted and
00:06:41.976 --> 00:06:44.656
because fasting happened in the New Testament also.
00:06:44.856 --> 00:06:49.276
And like I said, most especially because Jesus himself fasted.
00:06:49.356 --> 00:06:56.236
And of course, Jesus fasted for 40 days and Lent, even though it's 46 days, it.
00:06:56.681 --> 00:07:03.301
Is a 40-day fast. So how did we get from those facts, the Old Testament saints
00:07:03.301 --> 00:07:06.621
fasted, the early biblical followers of Jesus fasted,
00:07:06.721 --> 00:07:11.441
and Jesus himself fasted 40 days in the wilderness to where we are now with
00:07:11.441 --> 00:07:14.821
kind of complicated rituals surrounding Lent,
00:07:15.261 --> 00:07:19.141
like Ash Wednesday and the ashes on the forehead and things like that.
00:07:19.221 --> 00:07:23.301
And the answer to that question is church history and church tradition,
00:07:23.301 --> 00:07:26.361
even very early church history.
00:07:26.681 --> 00:07:33.261
As noted above, the first time that Lent was mentioned in anything that has
00:07:33.261 --> 00:07:36.961
survived, in other words, in any document that we still have,
00:07:37.121 --> 00:07:40.601
is Canon 5 of the Council of Nicaea.
00:07:40.761 --> 00:07:45.401
And the funny thing is that canon has nothing really to do with fasting at all,
00:07:45.481 --> 00:07:47.621
but it's about excommunication.
00:07:48.181 --> 00:07:52.901
And the pertinent part says this, It is decreed that in every province sentence
00:07:52.901 --> 00:07:58.381
should be held twice a year in order that when all the bishops of the province
00:07:58.381 --> 00:07:59.961
are assembled together,
00:08:00.221 --> 00:08:03.381
such questions may by them be thoroughly
00:08:03.381 --> 00:08:10.261
examined so that those who have confessedly offended against their bishop may
00:08:10.261 --> 00:08:17.401
seem by all to be for just cause excommunicated until it shall seem fit to a
00:08:17.401 --> 00:08:23.361
general meeting of the bishops to pronounce a milder sentence upon them,
00:08:23.521 --> 00:08:27.541
and let these synods be held, the one before Lent.
00:08:27.821 --> 00:08:33.941
That the pure gift may be offered to God after all bitterness has been put away,
00:08:34.101 --> 00:08:37.161
and let the second be held about autumn.
00:08:37.327 --> 00:08:41.267
So the point of the mention was that those who have been excommunicated,
00:08:41.447 --> 00:08:45.767
and we know that apparently many excommunications were not permanently,
00:08:45.767 --> 00:08:48.667
and that means to be expelled from the church.
00:08:48.687 --> 00:08:56.127
So those who have been excommunicated might possibly have the grace to be restored
00:08:56.127 --> 00:09:01.867
by the early church before Lent and Easter and the resurrection of Jesus is celebrated.
00:09:01.867 --> 00:09:07.527
And the way that that Canon 5 refers to Lent, it's very clear that this is not
00:09:07.527 --> 00:09:12.147
the first time that those Christians have heard of Lent or have been practicing Lent.
00:09:12.267 --> 00:09:18.727
And it indicates that by 325 AD, early in the 4th century, the church generally
00:09:18.727 --> 00:09:21.607
observed Lent prior to Easter.
00:09:21.807 --> 00:09:24.807
So how long had it been going on prior to that?
00:09:24.967 --> 00:09:29.027
Well, of course, we have no idea. But we do know that the Didache.
00:09:29.327 --> 00:09:34.767
Which is a compilation of early church teachings that dates to the 2nd century,
00:09:35.007 --> 00:09:37.227
possibly even the 1st century,
00:09:37.547 --> 00:09:42.227
did prescribe or command fasting before baptism.
00:09:42.547 --> 00:09:46.067
And in the Ferdinand passage, the Didache says, concerning baptism.
00:09:46.627 --> 00:09:51.647
Baptize this way, having first said all these things, baptize into the name
00:09:51.647 --> 00:09:57.447
of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Matthew 28, 19, in living water.
00:09:57.587 --> 00:10:05.287
But if you have not living water, baptize into other water, and if you cannot, in cold, in warm.
00:10:05.547 --> 00:10:10.027
They preferred cold over warm for baptism. But if you have not either,
00:10:10.287 --> 00:10:17.187
pour out water three times upon the head into the name of the Father and the Son and Holy Spirit.
00:10:17.187 --> 00:10:26.927
But before the baptism, let the baptizer fast and the baptized and whatever others can,
00:10:27.227 --> 00:10:32.887
but you shall order the baptized to fast one or two, not 40,
00:10:33.147 --> 00:10:35.307
but one or two days before.
00:10:35.932 --> 00:10:40.832
Connected to that, we know that Tertullian, an early church father that lived
00:10:40.832 --> 00:10:46.132
in the late 100s and the early 20s, wrote around that time that Easter and Resurrection
00:10:46.132 --> 00:10:49.192
Day was a most solemn day for baptism.
00:10:49.592 --> 00:10:53.552
So putting it all together, I think we can clearly see the origin for Lent with
00:10:53.552 --> 00:10:57.192
roots in the Old Testament, roots in the New Testament, roots in the practice
00:10:57.192 --> 00:11:02.152
of Jesus, and roots in the practice of the earliest apostolic churches.
00:11:02.792 --> 00:11:07.212
Many, if not most, traditions of Lent developed well after the New Testament
00:11:07.212 --> 00:11:11.132
and even after the time of the early church of the first centuries.
00:11:11.392 --> 00:11:16.312
That doesn't mean that the practices are invalid, but for many Christians,
00:11:16.512 --> 00:11:21.092
the teachings of Jesus and the apostles contained in the New Testament are the
00:11:21.092 --> 00:11:25.332
ultimate authorities for our practices and not church tradition.
00:11:25.552 --> 00:11:29.512
That said, while the practice of Lent is not commanded by the Word of God,
00:11:29.512 --> 00:11:34.072
It certainly has its roots in the Word of God, and it's not prohibited.
00:11:34.352 --> 00:11:38.932
In that spirit, I would like to offer some cautions and encouragements.
00:11:39.092 --> 00:11:47.052
So let's start with three reasons to practice Lent and three reasons maybe to not practice Lent.
00:11:47.312 --> 00:11:51.432
Number one, the practice of Lent, fasting before the celebration of Easter,
00:11:51.572 --> 00:11:53.912
is, as noted, rooted in Scripture.
00:11:54.452 --> 00:11:59.072
Fasting is a good thing, biblically speaking, a lone noted Christian spiritual
00:11:59.072 --> 00:12:05.972
discipline that has been done fruitfully by believers in Jesus Christ for nearly
00:12:05.972 --> 00:12:08.852
2,000 years in the Christian church.
00:12:09.232 --> 00:12:14.852
John Piper says, Christian fasting is unique among all the other kinds of fasting in the world.
00:12:15.032 --> 00:12:21.872
It is unique in that it expresses more than longing for Christ or hunger for Christ's presence.
00:12:21.872 --> 00:12:26.432
It is a hunger that is rooted in, based on an already present,
00:12:26.712 --> 00:12:31.432
experienced reality of Christ in history and in our hearts.
00:12:31.572 --> 00:12:36.132
In Christ, fasting is not just a Godward expression of our need.
00:12:36.132 --> 00:12:39.752
It is not just an admission that we are not fooled.
00:12:40.199 --> 00:12:47.219
Fasting is a statement in the very midst of our need that we are also not empty.
00:12:47.899 --> 00:12:52.139
Number two, in fasting and Ash Wednesday, when Christians put ashes on their
00:12:52.139 --> 00:12:57.779
foreheads, they do so in solidarity with the great saints of the past.
00:12:57.919 --> 00:13:03.219
For instance, Esther chapter 4 verse 1 says that when Mordecai learned all that
00:13:03.219 --> 00:13:09.179
had been done, he tore his clothes and put on sackcloth and ashes and went through
00:13:09.179 --> 00:13:12.339
the city wailing with a loud and bitter cry.
00:13:12.499 --> 00:13:18.959
In Job 42.6, as Job repented before God, he says, disown what I have said,
00:13:19.059 --> 00:13:22.279
and I repent in dust and ashes.
00:13:23.023 --> 00:13:28.443
In Daniel chapter 9, 3, Daniel describes his approach to God saying.
00:13:28.903 --> 00:13:37.603
I turn to the Lord God to seek help in prayer and in petition with fasting sackcloth and of ashes.
00:13:37.923 --> 00:13:44.443
So the ashes symbolize biblically repentance and an intentional focus on pursuing
00:13:44.443 --> 00:13:49.343
the Lord, which is obviously an ideal practice during the weeks leading up to
00:13:49.343 --> 00:13:52.683
Easter and, to be clear, any other time too.
00:13:52.683 --> 00:13:58.343
With ashes in the shape of the cross, Christians who do that practice remember
00:13:58.343 --> 00:14:04.023
that we are not Old Testament saints laboring under a sacrificial atonement
00:14:04.023 --> 00:14:06.663
system based on the slaughter of animals,
00:14:06.863 --> 00:14:13.923
but rather a new covenant system founded on the slaughter and resurrection of Christ the King.
00:14:14.323 --> 00:14:18.163
Number three, why should Christians consider practicing Lent?
00:14:18.163 --> 00:14:24.143
Well, in fasting, we imitate Jesus who also fasted, which is a wonderful thing
00:14:24.143 --> 00:14:28.803
in the same way that some have their quiet times of prayer and Bible reading
00:14:28.803 --> 00:14:32.923
at the precise same time every day and others don't.
00:14:33.163 --> 00:14:37.623
Some Christians fast at certain times during the year following the ancient
00:14:37.623 --> 00:14:42.863
church calendar and some Christians fast based on need and situation.
00:14:42.863 --> 00:14:49.263
As Charles Spurgeon will tell us in a moment, both approaches are okay according
00:14:49.263 --> 00:14:54.783
to the Bible and neither should be judged or treated as better than the other.
00:14:55.548 --> 00:15:00.568
So Lent, if, big if, if it focuses on us, on Christ,
00:15:00.888 --> 00:15:06.128
and prepares us to appreciate and celebrate the resurrection of Jesus in a more
00:15:06.128 --> 00:15:11.668
intentional and deeper-reaching way, it can be a great thing, a wonderful thing.
00:15:11.948 --> 00:15:18.368
However, Lent, another big if, if it becomes ritualized without meaning,
00:15:18.588 --> 00:15:24.388
can become a vain and empty practice that has no spiritual value.
00:15:24.508 --> 00:15:30.808
Or maybe even worse than that, if Lent is viewed as a way to receive salvific
00:15:30.808 --> 00:15:35.708
grace from God by the works of fasting and self-denial,
00:15:35.968 --> 00:15:41.468
then Lent can almost become idolatrous in that our own practice has the potential
00:15:41.468 --> 00:15:44.788
to replace the finished work of Christ on the cross.
00:15:44.928 --> 00:15:50.428
And along those lines, here are three cautions about Lent. Number one,
00:15:50.688 --> 00:15:56.948
Lent should not provide us an opportunity to judge other Christians in their pursuit of God.
00:15:57.308 --> 00:16:01.948
Along those lines, Paul writes in Colossians 2, verse 16, Therefore,
00:16:02.288 --> 00:16:07.748
don't let anyone judge you in regard to food and drink or in the matter of a
00:16:07.748 --> 00:16:10.848
festival or a new moon or a Sabbath.
00:16:11.128 --> 00:16:14.208
These are a shadow of what is to come.
00:16:14.388 --> 00:16:17.968
The substance is Christ or the Messiah.
00:16:17.968 --> 00:16:24.408
Because Lent is not commanded in Scripture, it's wrong and unwise to judge the
00:16:24.408 --> 00:16:29.868
behavior of other Christians based on whether or not they observe that season of fasting.
00:16:30.128 --> 00:16:37.268
Similarly, Paul says in Romans 14, 5, one person esteems, or holds up as important,
00:16:37.488 --> 00:16:43.888
one day as better than the other, while another person esteems all days alike.
00:16:44.557 --> 00:16:48.217
Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind.
00:16:48.397 --> 00:16:53.137
In other words, in Romans 14 and Colossians 2, we find there is room in the
00:16:53.137 --> 00:16:57.717
body of Christ for a real difference of opinion on whether or not festivals
00:16:57.717 --> 00:17:01.057
and observations and things like Lent should be observed,
00:17:01.057 --> 00:17:07.437
and we should not judge or look down on other Christians because they do or don't do this.
00:17:07.557 --> 00:17:13.637
As Paul says in Romans 14, 4, we are to leave the judgment of every Christian
00:17:13.637 --> 00:17:17.417
to his own master about whether he stands or falls.
00:17:17.657 --> 00:17:24.177
Number two, Lent should not become for us an avenue of receiving salvific grace
00:17:24.177 --> 00:17:29.417
from God through works. And I know that's a point of contention between Protestants
00:17:29.417 --> 00:17:31.857
and others, but fasting can be a good thing.
00:17:31.997 --> 00:17:38.197
It's certainly a way to mortify human fleshly desires that are sinful and provide
00:17:38.197 --> 00:17:41.477
an avenue for growing closer to God, and that's good.
00:17:41.657 --> 00:17:49.157
But when Lent is looked on as a means of saving grace, a means of earning merit
00:17:49.157 --> 00:17:53.317
to be saved, then it becomes very, very dangerous.
00:17:53.597 --> 00:17:57.057
Again, as Charles Spurgeon said, commenting on Colossians 2.16.
00:17:57.577 --> 00:18:02.837
Don't let anybody come in and tell you that it is necessary for your salvation
00:18:02.837 --> 00:18:06.217
that you abstain from this meat or that drink,
00:18:06.357 --> 00:18:12.297
that there is a merit in fasting for 40 days in Lent or that you cannot be saved
00:18:12.297 --> 00:18:15.077
without observing such and such a holy day.
00:18:15.397 --> 00:18:20.377
Your salvation, listener, if you have salvation, is in Christ.
00:18:20.757 --> 00:18:29.097
Keep you to that and add nothing to this one foundation, which is once and for all laid in him.
00:18:29.649 --> 00:18:34.909
Good words by Spurgeon. Finally, number three, I think it's dangerous to mandate
00:18:34.909 --> 00:18:40.369
or force or make a practice that is not mandated by scripture.
00:18:40.669 --> 00:18:47.029
St. Augustine of Hippo, or Augustine if you prefer that, wrote in the 5th century,
00:18:47.249 --> 00:18:55.549
our fast at any other time is voluntary, but during Lent we sin if we don't fast.
00:18:56.049 --> 00:19:01.629
Now look, I like St. Augustine. I'm grateful for him, but I disagree with our guy here.
00:19:01.789 --> 00:19:07.569
We should not declare something a sin that Scripture does not declare is sinful.
00:19:07.769 --> 00:19:09.189
That's a dangerous practice.
00:19:09.429 --> 00:19:12.969
Reformation 21 writer Carl Truman concurrently says,
00:19:13.169 --> 00:19:19.369
But that same commitment also means that I object most strongly to anybody trying
00:19:19.369 --> 00:19:25.029
to argue that it should be a normative practice for Christians to impose it
00:19:25.029 --> 00:19:31.789
on their congregations or to claim that it confers benefits that are unavailable elsewhere.
00:19:32.089 --> 00:19:36.709
Tim Challies is an excellent Reformed writer, and he says that he's cautious
00:19:36.709 --> 00:19:38.769
about the observation of Lent.
00:19:38.889 --> 00:19:41.529
He says, I do not myself observe Lent.
00:19:41.649 --> 00:19:46.289
I never have and don't ever expect to. My reasoning is first biblical.
00:19:46.609 --> 00:19:53.709
I'm hesitant to add practices the Bible does not command, especially when it
00:19:53.709 --> 00:19:58.249
seems tepid, lukewarm, at best about similar practices.
00:19:58.569 --> 00:20:03.609
Then there's the practical. My church covers this ground every week as we corporately
00:20:03.609 --> 00:20:11.929
remember Christ's sacrifice and confess our sins and receive assurance of God's forgiveness.
00:20:12.169 --> 00:20:16.189
And then there's the historical angle. I want to be historic,
00:20:16.469 --> 00:20:22.689
says Chalice, not innovative in my faith, and I find avoiding Lent to be most
00:20:22.689 --> 00:20:25.629
consistent with the Reformed tradition.
00:20:26.408 --> 00:20:32.068
Now, I don't know that I myself would be as cautious as either Truman or Chalice
00:20:32.068 --> 00:20:35.828
is, but I do think that Baptists, such as myself,
00:20:36.308 --> 00:20:42.148
would benefit often from being more intentional and more moored,
00:20:42.508 --> 00:20:47.588
slightly more, to the biblical aspects of church history and practice.
00:20:47.588 --> 00:20:54.608
At the same time, Lent, like any other unmandated Christian tradition observance,
00:20:54.608 --> 00:20:56.988
such as Easter and Christmas,
00:20:57.308 --> 00:21:02.988
which my family observes, but I know those things are not mandated to be observed.
00:21:03.208 --> 00:21:05.368
And Lent and celebration of
00:21:05.368 --> 00:21:11.488
Christmas must never replace the intimacy and vibrancy of knowing Christ,
00:21:11.848 --> 00:21:16.568
reading his word, turning away from our sins, confessing them and repenting,
00:21:16.668 --> 00:21:22.268
and remembering daily the sacrifice of Jesus, his crucifixion and resurrection.
00:21:22.268 --> 00:21:27.488
If Lent helps you do that, then it might be a good thing.
00:21:27.728 --> 00:21:32.988
But never let any ritual supplant Christ and his word in you,
00:21:33.148 --> 00:21:34.828
which is the hope of glory.
00:21:35.148 --> 00:21:38.708
Well, thanks for listening. Hope it's a great day for you. And I hope whatever
00:21:38.708 --> 00:21:43.008
happens today, it draws you closer to Christ. Good day to you and Godspeed.